For the record, all THREE parked cars are illegally parked. That's a no-parking zone. I didn't get the permits or plates of the other two cars this time.
Aren’t all of these pictures that you have posted either adjacent to, or across the street from, the Brooklyn Criminal Court? Isn’t this where theses vehicles are supposed to park? Do you believe that these vehicles should not be parked outside the criminal court? Where should police vans transporting prisoners park? Should they look for parking ten blocks away from the criminal court, and escort shackled prisoners through “your precious” neighborhood? What kind of complaints would that generate to 311?
It is not lost on some of us that the Department of Education at 110 Livingston has been sold to private developers. Do you think there’re spending all that money on renovating it to make affordable housing for the types of blue collar people who work in this area? Do workers have any rights in your eyes? Or is it only the landed gentry such as j_on_state?
Here’s an idea for all you rich up and coming types who are clearly spearheading this drive against the civil SERVANTS, who do your business, why don’t you do like the developers who have purchased 110 Livingston from the city have done, and use your money to purchase all of the city-owned buildings in the area, and move out the government agencies all together (where they would go is anyone’s guess), that way everyone by the “former” criminal court could chase out the “down-trodden”, and make this area “more acceptable” to the new development model.
You people move into municipal civic centers that have been where they are for decades, and then you complain that there are a lot of municipal vehicles around? Does that make any sense?
Did you people consider that before your forced the previous residents (who didn’t complain) out, to buy or rent all of these lovely brownstones you so recently have discovered?
Its like moving next to the sanitation land fill, and then complaining about the smell and high volume of city owned garbage trucks, or moving next to a nuclear power plant, and then joining a protest to ban the very reactors that were there before you even moved in. Or, you could just not move near the “nuisance”. But no, you have to be close to work, so you could easily take your mass transit the 10 to 15 minutes that it takes you to commute from downtown Brooklyn to Manhattan.
I wonder what kind of complaining is going to happen when the Department of Corrections re-opens the Brooklyn House of detention. The complaints to 311 will be “there are some many criminals over here. Its not safe for me and little Jimmy”, “why are all these people standing on Atlantic avenue making noise? Oh, there waiting to see criminals, we have to put a stop to that! Call the Mayor.
anonymous
Posted on Mon, Mar 19 2007 at 02:20 PM
mike,
sigh.
anonymous
Posted on Tue, Mar 20 2007 at 12:09 AM
There was an article years ago about J in one of the papers bitching and moaning how the NYSJ spots in front of her brownstone were taking up precious space that could be used by her personal vehicle and others on her block on State Street.
Now that the parking regs changed, she wants it all. Apparently when J moved into the area (in the mid 80's) the area was a depressed sh--hole. Drugs, homeless, abandoned buildings, etc. You couldnt give these crumbling buildings away. I am sure she appreciated the LE presence during those years but now, the court buildings have become an eyesore to her.
Her happy day is when the eyesore that is 120 Schermerhorn is closed and the Criminal court building moves to E. NY or Canarsie.
Mike, why don't you get the city employees to petition the city to turn one of those buildings into affordable housing for uncivil servants? Just because this city is as greedy as the next person, just because America is built on greed and the highest bidder wins, don't blame society.
anonymous
Posted on Thu, Mar 22 2007 at 12:28 PM
well even though one car is double parked and one is triple parked, at least all had the luxury of just pulling straight away. imagine if you were really tripled parked with someone to the front and back wouldnt that suck. when seeing this picture and the title of it, i couldnt help but to laugh out loud in my school library. i mean seriously wtf?
anonymous
Posted on Thu, Mar 22 2007 at 12:57 PM
Why not build a parking structure next to the courthouse if parking is needed. I believe that's why the road was built: people needed to use it to get from point a to point b. So perhaps we could employ the same logic and build a place to put cars that need access to the court house. Wouldn't that make more sense than littering the road with cars that wish to PARK wherever they please at the expense of people who need to USE the roads?
Comments will be posted after being reviewed by our moderators.
Please be constructive and respectful.
Threatening comments will be traced and investigated.
10 Comments
Login or Register to comment.
Posted on Sun, Mar 18 2007 at 09:29 PM
What are you complaining about . . . there's still one traffic lane left!
Posted on Sun, Mar 18 2007 at 10:51 PM
Thank God there's no bike lane there.
Posted on Mon, Mar 19 2007 at 02:04 PM
Aren’t all of these pictures that you have posted either adjacent to, or across the street from, the Brooklyn Criminal Court? Isn’t this where theses vehicles are supposed to park? Do you believe that these vehicles should not be parked outside the criminal court? Where should police vans transporting prisoners park? Should they look for parking ten blocks away from the criminal court, and escort shackled prisoners through “your precious” neighborhood? What kind of complaints would that generate to 311?
It is not lost on some of us that the Department of Education at 110 Livingston has been sold to private developers. Do you think there’re spending all that money on renovating it to make affordable housing for the types of blue collar people who work in this area? Do workers have any rights in your eyes? Or is it only the landed gentry such as j_on_state?
Here’s an idea for all you rich up and coming types who are clearly spearheading this drive against the civil SERVANTS, who do your business, why don’t you do like the developers who have purchased 110 Livingston from the city have done, and use your money to purchase all of the city-owned buildings in the area, and move out the government agencies all together (where they would go is anyone’s guess), that way everyone by the “former” criminal court could chase out the “down-trodden”, and make this area “more acceptable” to the new development model.
You people move into municipal civic centers that have been where they are for decades, and then you complain that there are a lot of municipal vehicles around? Does that make any sense?
Did you people consider that before your forced the previous residents (who didn’t complain) out, to buy or rent all of these lovely brownstones you so recently have discovered?
Its like moving next to the sanitation land fill, and then complaining about the smell and high volume of city owned garbage trucks, or moving next to a nuclear power plant, and then joining a protest to ban the very reactors that were there before you even moved in. Or, you could just not move near the “nuisance”. But no, you have to be close to work, so you could easily take your mass transit the 10 to 15 minutes that it takes you to commute from downtown Brooklyn to Manhattan.
I wonder what kind of complaining is going to happen when the Department of Corrections re-opens the Brooklyn House of detention. The complaints to 311 will be “there are some many criminals over here. Its not safe for me and little Jimmy”, “why are all these people standing on Atlantic avenue making noise? Oh, there waiting to see criminals, we have to put a stop to that! Call the Mayor.
Posted on Mon, Mar 19 2007 at 02:20 PM
mike,
sigh.
Posted on Tue, Mar 20 2007 at 12:09 AM
There was an article years ago about J in one of the papers bitching and moaning how the NYSJ spots in front of her brownstone were taking up precious space that could be used by her personal vehicle and others on her block on State Street.
Now that the parking regs changed, she wants it all. Apparently when J moved into the area (in the mid 80's) the area was a depressed sh--hole. Drugs, homeless, abandoned buildings, etc. You couldnt give these crumbling buildings away. I am sure she appreciated the LE presence during those years but now, the court buildings have become an eyesore to her.
Her happy day is when the eyesore that is 120 Schermerhorn is closed and the Criminal court building moves to E. NY or Canarsie.
Posted on Tue, Mar 20 2007 at 11:21 AM
Mike, why don't you get the city employees to petition the city to turn one of those buildings into affordable housing for uncivil servants? Just because this city is as greedy as the next person, just because America is built on greed and the highest bidder wins, don't blame society.
Posted on Thu, Mar 22 2007 at 12:28 PM
well even though one car is double parked and one is triple parked, at least all had the luxury of just pulling straight away. imagine if you were really tripled parked with someone to the front and back wouldnt that suck. when seeing this picture and the title of it, i couldnt help but to laugh out loud in my school library. i mean seriously wtf?
Posted on Thu, Mar 22 2007 at 12:57 PM
Why not build a parking structure next to the courthouse if parking is needed. I believe that's why the road was built: people needed to use it to get from point a to point b. So perhaps we could employ the same logic and build a place to put cars that need access to the court house. Wouldn't that make more sense than littering the road with cars that wish to PARK wherever they please at the expense of people who need to USE the roads?
Posted on Thu, Mar 22 2007 at 09:59 PM
you are expecting this city to "make sense"? wanna but a bridge? i have a nice one in brooklyn ;)
Posted on Fri, Mar 23 2007 at 08:27 PM
I've gotten summonsed for being as far into the crosswalk as the van is
BTW: across from a construction site, for what it's worth.
Leave a comment
Comments will be posted after being reviewed by our moderators.
Please be constructive and respectful.
Threatening comments will be traced and investigated.